Space Junk: The Plot Of The Next National Lampoon Vacation Movie

006882 13 Space Junk: The Plot Of The Next National Lampoon Vacation Movie

Did I ever tell yunz my idea for the next National Lampoon’s “Vacation” movie?

Here goes for any fledgeling Hollywood writer looking to steal ideas that Hollywood can’t come up with.

Clark Griswald’s company comes up with a line of foods to be used in space habitats (space stations and possibly lunar colonies). So, they select Clark, who was the primary designer in the line, and his family (yes, Chevy and Bev come back as the parents, but as per usual Rusty and Audrey are replaced by two new actors) as a test family on the international space station to live there for a couple weeks or months to try out the new space food line.

“But it’s just not a Vacation flick without Cousin Eddie,” I hear you saying. Well, he’s the inspiration for my whole “Space Vacation” idea … as long as Randy Quaid isn’t serving jail time for skipping out on hotel bills. Anyhow, he’s moved the wife (pregnant again? Yep, but being paid by some scientific firm to conceive, carry and deliver in space as a test to see the effects on woman who might live in zero or less than Earth gravity) and whatever kids they’ve managed to drag along with Snots the dog to said space station. But not to worry. After all the Vacation movies where Cousin Eddy has been lacking in employment, he’s been given the position of Debris and Refuse Custodial Salvage Czar (added that czar part in recognition of Obama). Needless to say Eddie’s job involves disposal of the space station’s trash, maintaining the toilets (shitter’s full), and managing a group of prisoners as a space-suited and jet-packed ‘road crew’ to clean up space junk from the decades of Earthly space missions that now threaten the space station. Of course, Clark has no idea Eddie’s on the space station until after he and the wife and kids are dropped off there and the shuttle has long gone.

vegasvacation Space Junk: The Plot Of The Next National Lampoon Vacation Movie

Come on, now … Can’t be any worse than Vegas Vacation. Think of the hilarious possibilities of bad pre-fab food, zero gravity, pressurized conditions, close quarters, Snots in a doggie space suit and helmet, disgruntled non-violent offenders second-guessing their volunteering for the mission in order to cut their sentences down, and no escape back to Earth. Remember, in space no one can hear you scream.

Cringely:

Tossed in Space

Just in case you are an astronaut and need something to worry about, according to NASA there are 18,000 pieces of space junk the size of a basketball or larger right now orbiting the earth. That’s 18,000 chances to slam into the International Space Station (ISS), bump into a U.S. Space Shuttle, or plow into any of a number of satellites in low Earth orbit. Twice the ISS has had to be moved to avoid potential collisions and one other time when it couldn’t be moved the crew huddled in their Soyuz taxicab for danger to pass, with one such near-miss taking place just last week, which is what inspired this column.

I say it is time to clean up all that junk.

Space junk means everything from rocket upper stages weighing several tons down to the odd wrench lost in space by space-walking astro- or cosmonauts. This stuff that got to space more or less by accident is now torquing above the ionosphere at around 17,000 miles-per-hour, which would be worse if nearly all the junk wasn’t going in the the same direction. Friction and gravity will eventually bring all the space junk back to earth, but that could take centuries. So I say simply to avoid any more space junk stories in USA Today, we ought to find a way to get rid of the stuff.

It won’t be easy. We can’t shoot it down, because even if we are accurate enough to hit the junk all we are likely to accomplish is blasting it into lots more smaller pieces that will need tracking. We could shoot it with high-powered lasers, but unless we were able to vaporize the debris completely, all we’d be doing is boring very nice holes in it.

Nope, we have to gather the stuff and bring it back to Earth. But how?

I propose a space garbage scow.

My garbage scow would use a very fine net to capture the debris and hold it. The net could be built from kevlar, but this week I’m making everything from carbon nanotubes, thanks, so that’s what we’ll use. Nanotubes have the highest strength-to-weight ratio of any material and would allow us to make a very large, very light weight net. Our point here is to make the net light rather than strong, since our capture speeds will be low and the lack of gravity ought to make it easy to keep the junk tethered together. The point of making it strong, then, is so it can be light enough to be big enough to maybe gather all the junk — all 18,000 pieces — into a single scow.

I imagine a seine purse-style net, if you know your commercial fishing. Launch the net into an inclined polar orbit generally higher than the space junk to be harvested. The polar orbit will ensure that eventually the scow will go over every spot on the Earth as the planet rotates below, but it also means the scow will eventually cross the path of every piece of space junk.

Here’s where we need an algorithm and a honking big computer, because this is a 3-D geometry problem with more than 18,000 variables. Our algorithm determines the most efficient path to use for gathering all 18,000 pieces of space junk.

I haven’t yet derived this algorithm, but I have some idea what it would look like. We’d start in a high orbit, above the space junk, because we could trade that altitude for speed as needed, simply by flying lower, trading potential energy for kinetic.

Dragging the net behind a little unmanned spacecraft my idea would be to go past each piece of junk in such a way that it not only lodges permanently in the net, but that doing so adds kinetic energy (hitting at shallow angles to essentially tack like a sailboat off the debris). But wait, there’s more! You not only have to try to get energy from each encounter, it helps if — like in a game of billiards or pool — each encounter results in an effective ricochet sending the net in the proper trajectory for its next encounter. Rinse and repeat 18,000 times.

It won’t always be possible, of course, to gain energy from each encounter, but that’s why we start in a higher orbit, so as energy is inevitably lost it can be replenished by moving to a lower orbit.

By the same token I think we would logically start with smaller bits of space junk so the net would gain mass steadily over time, then do the same again at each lower altitude. Eventually the net would have corralled hundreds of tons of debris, carrying it down into the atmosphere where atmospheric friction would eventually burn it all up in a spectacular visual display that would create a thin ring of fire all around the Earth.

It’s a crazy idea, sure, but it could work. For all the worrying we do about space junk hitting astronauts or rockets as they launch, we could pretty easily get rid of it all. Small to big, high to low, all it would take is time. How much time? If the scow orbits every 90 minutes and it takes an average of a dozen orbits to set up the capture of each piece of space junk, that’s 18,000 * 90 * 12 = 19.4 million minutes or 36.9 years to get it all.

Funny, that’s about how long it took to put all that crap up there in the first place.

  • Share/Bookmark

No Comments

(Required)
(Required, will not be published)
Improve the web with Nofollow Reciprocity.
} catch(err) {}